KINTO builds this layer on the ERP a company already has, or builds a new one when the old system cannot be saved.
The problem
In the cases KINTO has worked on, the ERP held the whole operation but nobody could see inside it. A real estate firm ran leases, invoicing, treasury and maintenance in a property-management ERP with thousands of undocumented API services, and its old website was maintained apart from the ERP. A freight operator ran on a web application more than twenty years old, with hundreds of thousands of waybills in one database and a twice-monthly close done in a macro-driven spreadsheet.
The cost was hidden. High-value customers stopped shipping without anyone noticing, and every day someone retyped data that already existed on a third party’s platform.
How KINTO approaches it
- Read first. KINTO inventories and curates what the ERP exposes, then connects agents in read-only mode. In the real estate case that was thousands of endpoints curated for agents.
- Show what does not match. The agent compares sources and shows, lease by lease or waybill by waybill, what does not match. A closing dashboard shows lease by lease the status of each document, with an approval queue and ERP and ledger matching document by document.
- Approve or validate what moves money. On an existing ERP, writes go through an approval queue with a dry run and a duplicate check, as in the real estate case. In a new ERP, the routine runs on its own once it matches the old system, and exceptions go to a person, as in the logistics case.
- Validate against the old system. Before turning anything off, KINTO compares record by record. In the logistics case, six months of billing periods matched to the cent on 100% of shared waybills.
What the system never does
- It never moves money or changes the books unchecked. Whatever does is approved by a person or validated against the previous system before it goes live; routine work that code can verify runs on its own.
- It never changes an existing ERP without a dry run and a duplicate check.
- It never replaces the old system on trust: the old system stays on until the comparison is clean.
- It never treats a total as proof. A matching total can hide offsetting errors.
Who it is for
Companies whose ERP is old, closed or poorly documented, with a manual close or staff retyping data between systems. Not every figure is in yet: accounting hours saved in the real estate case and data-entry hours saved in the logistics case have not been timed.