KINTO does both together, for companies that want to be found by search engines and cited by assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude.
The problem
Most sites are written for a visitor who scrolls, not for a system that extracts an answer. The answer is buried, the structured data is missing or wrong, the same FAQ text is copied across pages and a migration quietly drops half the URLs. In a store migration, a heavy catalog without normalized data left product pages with little to cite. In a fintech case, several companies with offers that are hard to explain needed pages that answer different audiences’ questions.
How KINTO approaches it
- Structured data that matches the page. Product, service and FAQ markup comes from the same field as the visible text, so they cannot disagree.
- Answers that stand alone. FAQs are short, specific and written to be quoted without the rest of the page. In the fintech case KINTO segmented each audience by its main question and turned typical objections into frequently asked questions.
- Files for assistants. llms.txt and llms-full.txt, plus citation metadata.
- Content by search intent. In the study-abroad case, dozens of articles were written to answer the searches students make: requirements, costs, visas and scholarships by country.
- Migrations that keep URLs. In one migration every store URL was inventoried before the platform change and about 98% stayed on the same path.
What the system never does
- It never fills pages with template text where only the product name changes.
- It never promises a ranking. Rankings depend on parties KINTO does not control.
- It never publishes a statistic it cannot source. Figures in pages come from cases or are labeled as the client’s.
- It never lets structured data contradict the visible page.
Who it is for
Companies with a catalog, a service that needs explaining, or a platform change coming, that want to be quoted correctly. This page is the same method applied to kinto.co itself.